Brand new Metacognition Questionnaire is an effective 65-item scale always assess the values people have regarding their considering

Brand new Metacognition Questionnaire is an effective 65-item scale always assess the values people have regarding their considering

They include five issues: self-confident care and attention thinking (“Alarming helps me to end troubles later on”), philosophy from the uncontrollability and you can possibilities (“My worrying is harmful in my situation”), intellectual competence (“I’ve nothing rely on in my memories having terms and conditions and you can brands”), standard bad philosophy (“Basically don’t handle a worrying think, following it simply happened, it could be my personal fault”), and you may intellectual care about-understanding (“I do believe much in the my personal view”). The metacognition questionnaire are obtained in a great cuatro section measure from step one (“don’t consent”) to 4 (“consent a whole lot”) together with good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. New metacognition questionnaire has been utilized generally into the low-logical examples particularly smokers and children [44, 45]. A woosa-ondersteuning whole rating is actually computed to form a list out-of metacognition per participant.

The fresh Compulsive-Obsessive Directory is actually good 42-items notice-report survey, examining the seriousness of various obsessions and compulsions off OCD when you look at the adults . The brand new compulsive-obsessive collection contains 7 subscales that include laundry (“We tidy my hands with greater regularity or more than expected”), checking (“I-go back to urban centers to ensure I have not injured somebody”), doubt (“Even when I do something very carefully I’m which isn’t a bit right”), purchasing (“I have upset if the anyone else possess changed how i keeps setup my personal something”), obsessing (“I have found challenging to manage my opinion”), hoarding (“We assemble anything I don’t you would like”), and you may neutralising (“Personally i think I want to recite particular numbers”). Which list was scored with the a great cuatro point Likert scale, from a single (“not really”) in order to cuatro (“extremely”) along with an excellent Chronbach’s leader = .88. An entire rating are calculated in order to create that rating for each participant regarding O-C episodes.


Chances decide to try out of university students participated in the research. Members was basically to start with given information regarding the study and provided the opportunity to make inquiries regarding it. Shortly after providing consent, each fellow member considering market recommendations, and then was basically served with new four forms inside the a great counterbalanced order to respond to from the their own day. In the event the participant complete he/she is actually thanked and debriefed. Every information and functions used new ethical advice and procedures detail by detail by Western Emotional Relationship and you may was indeed seemed and you can approved of the University off Hertfordshire integrity committee (Number:14149216).


Study are screened for forgotten viewpoints, outliers and you will assumptions away from analytical analysis just before any research . All of the details had appropriate thinking to own skewness and you may kurtosis no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of countless all the determined indexes found positive and you will extreme contacts among them (Table 1). The best association try within indexes out of county and characteristic anxiety, followed closely by brand new organization anywhere between stress awareness, metacognition and you may O-C symptoms.

Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].

In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.

Запись опубликована в рубрике Woosa visitors. Добавьте в закладки постоянную ссылку.